Bearing life L10: what it says and what it does not, with load, speed and reliability
From the catalogue dynamic load rating to the basic rating life, then to the reliability and operating-condition adjustment: we calculate a bearing's expected life step by step, show why a small increase in load shortens life so much, and list the questions L10 does not answer.
Bearing life calculation invites one confusion above all: the "life" figure in the catalogue versus the real life in the field. L10 says that 90% of identical bearings will last at least that long; 10% fail earlier. It is not an average, it is a lower bound.
1. Basic rating life
- L10 = (C / P)^p million revolutions; p = 3 for ball bearings, p = 10/3 for roller bearings.
- L10h = L10 × 10⁶ / (60 × n) hours; n in revolutions per minute.
Example: dynamic load rating C = 25.5 kN (from the catalogue), equivalent dynamic load P = 3.1 kN, speed 1,450 rpm, ball bearing.
- C / P = 8.23
- L10 = 8.23³ = 556.6 million revolutions
- L10h = 556.6 × 10⁶ / (60 × 1,450) = 6,398 hours
With the same C, P and speed, a roller bearing (p = 10/3) gives 12,914 hours; the difference in the exponent shows why roller bearings are preferred under heavy load.
2. A small change in load changes life a lot
Because the exponent is 3, a 25% increase in load cuts life by nearly half:
- load × 0.8 → P = 2.48 kN → L10h = 12,495 hours
- load × 1.0 → P = 3.10 kN → L10h = 6,398 hours
- load × 1.25 → P = 3.88 kN → L10h = 3,276 hours
This is where the most common loss of life in the field comes from: belt tension, misalignment or unbalance raise the equivalent load, the catalogue life looks unchanged, but the real life halves. Vibration measurement does not see this load directly; it sees unbalance and misalignment, and the load is inferred from them.
3. Reliability adjustment
If you want 95% reliability instead of 90%, a1 = 0.64 (the value commonly given in ISO 281; verify against the standard or the catalogue before publishing):
- L5mh = 0.64 × 6,398 = 4,094 hours
Asking 95% of the same bearings to survive pulls the planning life from 6,398 to 4,094 hours. On critical equipment, spares and maintenance intervals are planned on this figure, not on L10.
4. The bearing needed for a target life
If 40,000 hours are targeted on this machine (at 95% reliability), the required dynamic load rating is C = 54.5 kN, 2.14 times the current bearing. The target therefore calls for a larger bearing or a lower load; it cannot be closed by maintaining more often.
Questions L10 does not answer
- Lubrication, contamination and temperature: the a_ISO factor in ISO 281 (a23 in the tool) carries them; without a catalogue value it is taken as 1 and the result is optimistic.
- Mounting errors and electrical erosion: these are not fatigue and sit outside the calculation; most early failures come from here.
- Heavy loads with P/C > 0.5: the model loses reliability in this region and the tool warns.
- When one particular bearing will fail: L10 is the lower 10% of a distribution and gives no date for a single part. The closest thing to a date is the vibration trend.
Try it with your own bearing
The bearing life L10 calculator works from C, P (or Fr, Fa with X, Y), speed and reliability; it holds no bearing data, you enter it from your catalogue. To interpret it together with the vibration trend, get in touch.
Let's discuss this for your plant
More notes
All notes →- 3 min readMTBF, MTTR and availability: three numbers, three different questionsMTBF says how often a machine fails, MTTR how quickly it comes back, availability what share of the time the line can produce. We calculate all three from one example, show which decision each one supports, and list the four most common mistakes.
- 3 min readPareto of downtime causes: 80/20 is not a law, it is a starting pointWe rank one month of downtime records by cause and work out the cumulative share. The example deliberately does not follow 80/20: five of eight causes make up 86.7% of the total. We show how to choose the threshold, how record quality distorts the result, and what comes after Pareto.
- 3 min readThe true cost of unplanned downtime: how to calculate lost hours, repair and the payback of predictive maintenanceThe cost of one stoppage is more than the repair invoice. We walk through lost production hours, repair and a realistic estimate of what early warning saves in one worked example, and show which assumption moves the result most.